WASHINGTON, Sept. 12, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Might Jung LLP is proud to announce an important felony construction within the ongoing Stanton View litigation involving six Cloudy, feminine, low- to moderate-income first-time homebuyers who confronted considerably unsafe residing situations nearest buying devices on the RiverEast at Grandview Rental advanced in Southeast Washington, D.C. in the course of the District of Columbia’s Housing Acquire Aid Program (HPAP).
In a groundbreaking choice, the District of Columbia Court docket of Appeals has reversed the decrease court docket’s dismissal of key claims filed below the District of Columbia Shopper Coverage Procedures Operate (CPPA). This ruling holds that the District of Columbia, thru its Segment of Housing and Crowd Building (DHCD), may also be liable below the CPPA as a “merchant” when it facilitates the sale of substandard housing thru govt methods.
Background
The plaintiffs on this case are homebuyers who had been promised inexpensive, liveable housing in the course of the HPAP program. In a while nearest transferring into their devices, the plaintiffs reported diverse problems with their logo pristine houses, together with foundational cracks, sewage odors, mould, leaks, and electric problems—all of which rendered their houses uninhabitable. In spite of repeated calls for upkeep and pleas for support from the District, those problems persevered, in the end for the purpose of necessary evacuations from their houses. The overall contractors, Stanton View Dev., LLP and RiverEast at Anacostia, LLP, who gained goodwill of the undertaking and over $6 million greenbacks from the District, after filed for chapter, departure the householders with modest recourse.
Then Pass judgement on Lopez brushed aside key claims towards the District, together with violations below the CPPA, the plaintiffs, represented by way of Might Jung LLP, appealed the verdict. On September 12, 2024, the D.C. Court docket of Appeals issued a ruling that reversed and remanded the dismissal of the CPPA declare, re-opening the door for the plaintiffs to pursue justice for the unfair and misleading practices’ claims alleged towards the District.
Why This Ruling Is Impressive
This choice is unheard of and marks a essential victory for housing justice and shopper coverage within the District of Columbia. The Court docket of Appeals held that the District is a “merchant” below the CPPA below those info, permitting claims for unfair and misleading practices to go towards the federal government entity for its function in facilitating the sale of uninhabitable housing. This can be a important step towards making sure that govt businesses are held responsible for his or her function in administering housing methods and protective the rights of prone homebuyers.
“This decision affirms the principle that nobody is above the law, including government entities, especially when consumers are harmed in such egregious ways related to their homes,” mentioned Je Yon Jung, supremacy suggest for the plaintiffs. “Our clients did everything that the District required of them to participate in the American dream of homeownership. Instead, they have been forced to spend years in a house of horrors and nightmares fighting for accountability and justice. While we awaited the court of appeal’s correction of the dismissal of the District from the original case filed in early 2021, we have continued to litigate against several subcontractors and individuals involved with this property. To date, nobody has taken accountability for this debacle. We look forward to holding the District and all of the other responsible parties accountable.”
Implications for Moment Circumstances
This ruling no longer handiest supplies the plaintiffs with the chance to pursue their claims but additionally units a pristine felony precedent for containing govt entities accountable below shopper coverage rules. The case will go back to the trial court docket sooner than Pass judgement on Yvonne Williams for additional lawsuits, the place the plaintiffs will pursue their CPPA declare, and might be consolidated with alternative instances involving the subcontractors and the person house owners of the bankrupt entities.
Might Jung, LLP filed a indistinguishable case in federal U.S. District Court docket alleging unconstitutional takings and primary modification retaliation towards the District. Might Jung LLP will proceed to constitute the plaintiffs as they struggle for truthful remedy, and the appropriate to are living in safeguard, liveable houses.
For more info or to time table an interview with the felony crew, please touch at [email protected]. For more info about Might Jung LLP, seek advice from www.mayjung.com.
SOURCE Might Jung LLP
WANT YOUR COMPANY’S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?
440k+
Newsrooms &
Influencers
9k+
Virtual Media
Retailers
270k+
Reporters
Opted In