In a hour of increased meals costs, extra U.S. shoppers are discarding suitable for eating meals in advance because of misperceptions of meals past labels
NEW YORK, Feb. 27, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — U.S. shoppers record discarding meals alike or moment the label past much more ceaselessly than they did in 2016, consistent with untouched findings from a countrywide survey on U.S. client perceptions of meals past labels. Researchers from the Harvard Legislation Faculty Meals Legislation and Coverage Hospital, ReFED, and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Nation Fitness printed up to date 2025 findings from a survey that used to be first performed in 2016.1 The 2025 survey, performed January 10-14, 2025, by way of The Harris Ballot amongst over 2,000 U.S. adults, discovered that 43% of U.S. shoppers say they at all times or normally abandon meals alike or moment the label past (up from 37% in 2016), and 88% say they achieve this no less than once in a while (up from 84% in 2016). The findings are important as a result of maximum meals remainder preserve to consume moment the published past consistent with the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service.
Each trade leaders and federal and state-level policymakers have initiated steps in recent times to reform meals past labels in an aim to loose dubiousness, on the other hand, the find out about makes sunlit those have no longer had the specified impact. ReFED estimates that U.S. shoppers misuse akin to 35 million heaps of meals once a year at a worth of just about $800 in keeping with particular person. Dubiousness over past labels lonely leads U.S. shoppers to fribble away about 3 billion kilos of meals, significance $7 billion, each and every while, consistent with ReFED, which identifies standardizing past labels as one of the cost-effective answers for decreasing meals misuse.
Extra key findings and interpretations from the 2025 survey come with:
- Future a mean of 87% of U.S. shoppers believed they knew the meanings of 8 other labels, when quizzed, best a mean of 53% spoke back as it should be.
- Customers significance past labels in a different way relying at the meals merchandise. Misinformed alternatives supremacy to meals protection possibility when meals that are meant to be discarded isn’t (e.g., deli meats), and useless misuse when meals that’s nonetheless suitable for eating is thrown away (e.g., breakfast cereal).
- 44% of U.S. shoppers mistakenly suppose the government regulates the words on meals past labels (up from 36% in 2016) when in reality best the past labels on toddler formulation are federally regulated.
- Time labels are particularly more likely to lie to teams that can face financial vulnerabilities, similar to younger adults.
This untouched knowledge is especially related at a hour when meals costs are increased. Additionally, the USDA and FDA have a public request for information on meals past labels, together with the connection between meals past labels, meals misuse, and family bills, with feedback due by way of March 5, 2025.
The authors determine two pressing priorities in keeping with the find out about: a federally regulated device of constant meals past labels folk can accept as true with, and client schooling that may train what the labels in fact cruel.
“At a time when consumers are trying to stretch their food budgets to deal with high prices, we need to be doing everything we can to help maximize the value of the food they’re already purchasing, and addressing consumer confusion over date labels should be top of the list,” says Dana Gunders, president of ReFED and co-author of the record. “ReFED’s modeling shows that standardizing date labels could prevent at least 425,000 tons of food waste annually, and that translates directly to cost savings for consumers. While we’re not moving in the right direction, the stage is set and the time to act is now.”
“More people than ever mistakenly discard safe and healthy food, and this study suggests that efforts like the food industry’s voluntary Product Code Dating Initiative, while a commendable effort to start us on a path towards clearer date labels, do not seem to have improved how people use or interpret date labels,” says Emily Huge Leib, college director of the Meals Legislation and Coverage Hospital at Harvard Legislation Faculty and co-author of the record. “A federally regulated system of standardized food date labels people can trust—along with consumer education that clarifies what they mean—would not only reduce food waste but also save money and better use our natural resources.”
“The message for consumers is also striking: You might be throwing out food when you don’t need to,” says Roni Neff, schoolteacher within the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Faculty of Nation Fitness, Branch of Environmental Fitness and Engineering and co-author of the record. “We found that across labels, on average 39% of respondents thought they knew the label meanings but were incorrect. In fact, in nearly all cases, it’s better to rely on your senses than the label when deciding whether food is still good to eat. (Exceptions include items such as deli meats and soft cheeses).”
To obtain the find out about, click here. To put up feedback for the USDA-FDA Nation Request for Knowledge on meals past labels, click here.
About ReFED
ReFED is a U.S.-based nonprofit that catalyzes the meals device towards evidence-based motion to prevent losing meals. We paintings to extend adoption of meals misuse answers around the provide chain by way of cultivating and convening the meals network, handing over actionable proof and insights, and seeding and accelerating promising projects. Our visible is a sustainable, resilient, and inclusive meals device that makes the most productive significance of the meals we develop. To be told extra about answers to loose meals misuse, please talk over with www.refed.org.
About Harvard Legislation Faculty Meals Legislation and Coverage Hospital
The Harvard Law School Food Law and Policy Clinic (FLPC) serves spouse organizations and communities by way of offering steering on state of the art meals device problems generation enticing and teaching legislation scholars within the apply of meals legislation and coverage. FLPC is dedicated to advancing a cross-sector, multidisciplinary, and inclusive technique to its paintings, development partnerships with educational establishments, executive companies, nonprofit organizations, private-sector actors, and civil community with experience in family fitness, the condition, and the economic system. FLPC’s paintings specializes in expanding get admission to to wholesome meals, supporting sustainable manufacturing and regional meals programs, selling community-led meals device trade, and decreasing misuse of wholesome, healthy meals.
About Johns Hopkins Branch of Environmental Fitness and Engineering
The Johns Hopkins Branch of Environmental Fitness and Engineering, which spans the Bloomberg Faculty of Nation Fitness and the Whiting Faculty of Engineering, leads pioneering analysis and prepares the later age of students to resolve vital and complicated problems on the interface of family fitness and engineering. Be informed extra about our programs.
Survey Form:
This survey used to be performed on-line inside the US by way of The Harris Ballot to the behalf of Johns Hopkins Faculty of Nation Fitness from January 10-14, 2025, amongst 2,069 adults ages 18 and used. The sampling precision of Harris on-line polls is steady by way of the usage of a Bayesian credible pause. For this find out about, the pattern information is correct to inside +/- 2.5 proportion issues the usage of a 95% self belief point. For whole survey technique, together with weighting variables and subgroup pattern sizes, please touch Roni Neff at [email protected].
Media Touch:
Jaime Rice
[email protected]
1 The 2016 survey used to be performed by way of ORC World with other sampling, incorporated 1,029 U.S. adults, and a couple of questions have been moderately other.
SOURCE ReFED
